Person

Mary F. Lewis

A Clarke County woman living near Boyce whose claim for supplies taken by Union forces in 1864 went from Congress to the Court of Claims in 1888, was valued at $1,002 in 1891 and appropriated in 1899. Her family knows her as Mary Frances (Bell) Lewis of Locust Grove.

What the sources support

Mary F. Lewis's petition, as the Court of Claims summarized it, said she lived near Boyce and that United States forces under Gen. P. H. Sheridan took quartermaster stores and commissary supplies from her Clarke County farm in 1864 worth $1,925.

✓ Supported by a source
See the source and its limits
✓ Supported by a sourceAn account exists

Mary F. Lewis's petition, as the Court of Claims summarized it, said she lived near Boyce and that United States forces under Gen. P. H. Sheridan took quartermaster stores and commissary supplies from her Clarke County farm in 1864 worth $1,925.

What the source supports

What she claimed, and how much.

Uncertainty

These are her allegations, not the court's findings. The court found a different value.

Source

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. The allegation and its total.

H. Misc. Doc. No. 44, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (Serial Set 2959): Court of Claims findings, Congressional Case No. 5328, Mary F. (Francis) Lewis v. The United States (1892)

United States Court of Claims, transmitted to the House of Representatives · 1892-01-19 (publication)

Locator: Page 2, allegations of the petition

Relevant passage
That she is a citizen of the United States, residing near Boyce, Clarke County, State of Virginia, where she resided during the late war of the rebellion; that at different times during said period the United States forces, by proper authority, took from your petitioner quartermaster stores and commissary supplies of the value of $1,925

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: court-of-claims-5328-lewis. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. Sheridan's forces and her farm.

H. Misc. Doc. No. 44, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (Serial Set 2959): Court of Claims findings, Congressional Case No. 5328, Mary F. (Francis) Lewis v. The United States (1892)

United States Court of Claims, transmitted to the House of Representatives · 1892-01-19 (publication)

Locator: Page 2, after the schedule

Relevant passage
All of the above property was taken by and for the use of the United States armies, commanded by Gen. P. H. Sheridan, from claimant's farm, in Clarke County, Va.

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: court-of-claims-5328-lewis. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

AI-assisted source check (Claude Opus 5.5) · 2026-09-23. How this project checks its sources

On December 7, 1891, the Court of Claims found that stores and supplies had been taken from the claimant's farm in Clarke County in 1864 for the use of the Army, and that their reasonable value was $1,002.

✓ Documented
See the source and its limits
✓ DocumentedThat it was so

On December 7, 1891, the Court of Claims found that stores and supplies had been taken from the claimant's farm in Clarke County in 1864 for the use of the Army, and that their reasonable value was $1,002.

What the source supports

The court valuation, distinct from both the claim and any payment.

Uncertainty

A finding of value reported to Congress. It is not an award paid and not a payment.

Source

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. The finding of fact and its filing date.

H. Misc. Doc. No. 44, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (Serial Set 2959): Court of Claims findings, Congressional Case No. 5328, Mary F. (Francis) Lewis v. The United States (1892)

United States Court of Claims, transmitted to the House of Representatives · 1892-01-19 (publication)

Locator: Page 2, findings of fact

Relevant passage
There was taken from the claimant's farm in Clark County, Va., in 1864, stores and supplies, as above set forth, for the use of the Army, the reasonable value of which was $1,002. ... Filed December 7, 1891.

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: court-of-claims-5328-lewis. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

AI-assisted source check (Claude Opus 5.5) · 2026-09-23. How this project checks its sources

The act of March 3, 1899, chapter 426, directed the Secretary of the Treasury to pay "Mary F. Lewis, of Clarke County, one thousand and two dollars," in full and final release of her claim.

✓ Documented
See the source and its limits
✓ DocumentedThat it was so

The act of March 3, 1899, chapter 426, directed the Secretary of the Treasury to pay "Mary F. Lewis, of Clarke County, one thousand and two dollars," in full and final release of her claim.

What the source supports

That $1,002 was appropriated to her.

Uncertainty

An appropriation authorizes and directs payment; it does not show that money was paid, when, to whom, or net of any attorney's fee. No Treasury payment record has been examined.

Source

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. Her entry in the Virginia list, read from the page image.

Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 426, 30 Stat. 1161: "An Act For the allowance of certain claims for stores and supplies reported by the Court of Claims under ... the Bowman Act"

United States Congress · 1899-03-03 (creation)

Locator: Page 1185, Virginia list

Relevant passage
To Mary F. Lewis, of Clarke County, one thousand and two dollars.

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: statutes-at-large-30-ch426. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. The direction to pay and the full-and-final-release terms.

Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 426, 30 Stat. 1161: "An Act For the allowance of certain claims for stores and supplies reported by the Court of Claims under ... the Bowman Act"

United States Congress · 1899-03-03 (creation)

Locator: Page 1161, enacting clause

Relevant passage
That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to claimants in this Act named the several sums appropriated herein, the same being in full for, and the receipt of the same to be taken and accepted in each case as a full and final release and discharge of their respective claims

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: statutes-at-large-30-ch426. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Contemporary document

Evidence role: contextualizes. Where payment was to go if a claimant had died.

Act of March 3, 1899, ch. 426, 30 Stat. 1161: "An Act For the allowance of certain claims for stores and supplies reported by the Court of Claims under ... the Bowman Act"

United States Congress · 1899-03-03 (creation)

Locator: Pages 1213-1214, closing provisions

Relevant passage
In case of the death of any claimant, or death or discharge of any executor or administrator of any claimant herein named, then payment of such claim as herein provided shall be made to the legal representatives

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: statutes-at-large-30-ch426. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

AI-assisted source check (Claude Opus 5.5) · 2026-09-23. How this project checks its sources

The essay identifies the claimant as Mary Frances (Bell) Lewis of Locust Grove, and the losses it lists match the court's summary of Mary F. Lewis's claim: two horses, 755 bushels of corn, 50 of wheat, three barrels of flour, 14 hogs, 15 sheep, 85 turkeys and 75 chickens, in August, November and December.

✓ Supported by a source
See the source and its limits
✓ Supported by a sourceAn account exists

The essay identifies the claimant as Mary Frances (Bell) Lewis of Locust Grove, and the losses it lists match the court's summary of Mary F. Lewis's claim: two horses, 755 bushels of corn, 50 of wheat, three barrels of flour, 14 hogs, 15 sheep, 85 turkeys and 75 chickens, in August, November and December.

What the source supports

Why the court claimant and the woman of Locust Grove are taken to be the same.

Uncertainty

The connection to the house comes from the family account. The federal records do not name Locust Grove, Westbrook or her maiden name.

Source

Later historical account

Evidence role: supports. The essay's line of descent to Locust Grove.

Barry H. Lewis, "A Legacy Imperiled", guest essay, Clarke Monthly, September 2026, pages 4-5

Barry H. Lewis, in Clarke Monthly · 2026-09 (publication)

Locator: Page 4, family history and "The Civil War"

Relevant passage
Their daughter Mary Frances Bell married Thomas D. Lewis, and Locust Grove came into the Lewis family. ... My great-great grandmother, Mary Frances (Bell) Lewis, Thomas having died in 1862, had regular encounters with Union soldiers.

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: lewis-family-account-2026. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Later historical account

Evidence role: supports. The essay's list of losses.

Barry H. Lewis, "A Legacy Imperiled", guest essay, Clarke Monthly, September 2026, pages 4-5

Barry H. Lewis, in Clarke Monthly · 2026-09 (publication)

Locator: Page 4, "The Civil War"

Relevant passage
In August, November, and December, ... supplies, grain, and livestock were taken. Two horses were taken. Seven hundred fifty-five bushels of corn, 50 bushels of wheat, and three barrels of flour were taken. Fourteen hogs, 15 sheep, 85 turkeys, and 75 chickens were confiscated.

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: lewis-family-account-2026. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. The court's summary of the claimed items.

H. Misc. Doc. No. 44, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (Serial Set 2959): Court of Claims findings, Congressional Case No. 5328, Mary F. (Francis) Lewis v. The United States (1892)

United States Court of Claims, transmitted to the House of Representatives · 1892-01-19 (publication)

Locator: Page 2, itemized schedule, 1864

Relevant passage
Aug. 11. One saddle and harness horse ... One strong work horse ... Aug. 14. Fourteen hogs ... Nov. 15. Fifteen sheep ... Seven hundred and twenty bushels corn ... Aug. 10, 11. Fifty bushels wheat ... Eighty-five turkeys ... Seventy-five chickens and other fowls ... Dec. 10. Three barrels family flour ... Thirty-five bushels corn ... 1,925.00

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: court-of-claims-5328-lewis. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

Contemporary document

Evidence role: supports. Near Boyce, Clarke County.

H. Misc. Doc. No. 44, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (Serial Set 2959): Court of Claims findings, Congressional Case No. 5328, Mary F. (Francis) Lewis v. The United States (1892)

United States Court of Claims, transmitted to the House of Representatives · 1892-01-19 (publication)

Locator: Page 2, allegations of the petition

Relevant passage
That she is a citizen of the United States, residing near Boyce, Clarke County, State of Virginia, where she resided during the late war of the rebellion; that at different times during said period the United States forces, by proper authority, took from your petitioner quartermaster stores and commissary supplies of the value of $1,925

Checked: Original inspected. A digital reproduction was inspected; no original has been handled.

Open source

Source family: court-of-claims-5328-lewis. Multiple passages from one source are not independent witnesses.

AI-assisted source check (Claude Opus 5.5) · 2026-09-23. How this project checks its sources

Also indexed as: Mary Francis Lewis; Mary Frances (Bell) Lewis. Life dates that aren't known aren't guessed at here.

Know who this was, or something the records here miss? Help fill a gap. It stays private until it is reviewed.

Keep exploring

Related stories

Land, work & community✓ Supported

Mary F. Lewis’s Civil War property claim

In 1864, according to her later claim, Union forces took horses, livestock and grain from Mary F. Lewis's farm near Boyce. The record follows her claim to a court valuation and an 1899 appropriation. Whether the money was paid has not been found.

What the evidence says Three federal records for the claim, the valuation and the appropriation; a family essay for the rest. No payment record.

  • 3 min read
  • 5 sources

Search

Searches the released collection only.